![]() Disappointing, because the concept is so rich and important, surely there is not a shortage of tragedies that end up ruining the lives of innocent people due to cultural barriers and prejudice? It seems like they just picked a dud of a case which they hoped would fit their concept but at the end you most likely still side with the jury. It’s really just a super long recap of a terrible tragedy and a possible tragedy of a man (maybe?) being wrongly convicted. There’s no real digging into the father or the mothers enemies, no dialogue with the neighbors or members of the community to suggest why they think or heard happened. They hardly even posit an alternative to Robin, which seems like the minimum an investigative podcast should do. There is very little discovery or investigation that furthers our understanding of the facts and events and what happened to the three victims. However, the hard truth of it is that you don’t learn anything in episodes 2-10 that you didn’t learn in episode 1. I thought this podcast was well produced, sounded good, and had a great and important concept. Please read, understand, and follow the rules.Ĭontact the moderators if you have questions, concerns, or seek a special exemption for any of these rules.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |